我正在构建一个模型,使用开源的pvlib软件(和CEC模块)来估计每年的光伏能量输出。我在模型中遇到了一些不一致之处,希望社区能提供任何疑难解答。
我的主要问题是:模型告诉我,理想的北半球surface_azimuth用于能源生产(即。能源产量最高的surface_azimuth约为76°(正东偏北),而能源生产最差的surface_azimuth约为270°(偏西)。然而,我知道北半球的理想surface_azimuth应该是180°(正南),最坏的surface_azimuth在0°(正北)。
方位角 --这也是在附加的代码末尾生成的。
有人能帮我纠正这个问题或纠正我的理解吗?
下面复制的代码,以供参考
import os
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import os
import os.path
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import pvlib
from geopy.exc import GeocoderTimedOut
from geopy.geocoders import Nominatim
from IPython.display import Image
## GET THE LATITUDE & LONGITUDE OF A GIVEN CITY
geolocator = Nominatim(user_agent="____'s app")
geo = geolocator.geocode("Berkeley")
## CHECK THAT CITY IS CORRECT (by Country, State, etc.)
print(geo.address)
# CHECK THE LAT, LON order
print(geo.latitude, geo.longitude)
## SELECT THE YEAR & TIMES YOU'D LIKE TO MODEL OFF
YEAR = 2019
STARTDATE = '%d-01-01T00:00:00' % YEAR
ENDDATE = '%d-12-31T23:59:59' % YEAR
TIMES = pd.date_range(start=STARTDATE, end=ENDDATE, freq='H')
## ACCESS THE NREL API TO EXTRACT WEATHER DATA
NREL_API_KEY = os.getenv('NREL_API_KEY', 'DEMO_KEY')
## FILL IN THE BLANK WITH YOUR EMAIL ADRRESS
EMAIL = os.getenv('EMAIL', '_______.com')
##NEED TO COMMENT OUT THIS LINE BELOW -- if you call it too many times within an hour, it will break your code
header, data = pvlib.iotools.get_psm3(LATITUDE, LONGITUDE, NREL_API_KEY, EMAIL)
## SELECT THE PVLIB PANEL & INTERVTER YOU'D LIKE TO USE
## CAN ALSO CHOOSE FROM SANDIA LABS' DATASET OF PANELS & INVERTERS (check out the function)
## WE CHOSE THE CECMods because they highlighted the ones that were BIPV
INVERTERS = pvlib.pvsystem.retrieve_sam('CECInverter')
INVERTER_10K = INVERTERS['SMA_America__SB10000TL_US__240V_']
CECMODS = pvlib.pvsystem.retrieve_sam('CECMod')
## SELECT THE PANEL YOU'D LIKE TO USE (NOTE: THE PEVAFERSA MODEL IS A BIPV PANEL)
CECMOD_MONO = CECMODS['Pevafersa_America_IP_235_GG']
## CREATING AN ARRAY TO ITERATE THROUGH IN ORDER TO TEST DIFFERENT SURFACE_AZIMUTHS
heading_array = np.arange(0, 361, 2)
heading_array
heading_DF = pd.DataFrame(heading_array).rename(columns = {0: "Heading"})
heading_DF.head()
# geo IS AN OBJECT (the given city) CREATED ABOVE
LATITUDE, LONGITUDE = geo.latitude, geo.longitude
# data IS AN OBJECT (the weather patterns) CREATED ABOVE
# TIMES IS ALSO CREATED ABOVE, AND REPRESENTS TIME
data.index = TIMES
dni = data.DNI.values
ghi = data.GHI.values
dhi = data.DHI.values
surface_albedo = data['Surface Albedo'].values
temp_air = data.Temperature.values
dni_extra = pvlib.irradiance.get_extra_radiation(TIMES).values
# GET SOLAR POSITION
sp = pvlib.solarposition.get_solarposition(TIMES, LATITUDE, LONGITUDE)
solar_zenith = sp.apparent_zenith.values
solar_azimuth = sp.azimuth.values
# CREATING THE ARRY TO STORE THE DAILY ENERGY OUTPUT BY SOLAR AZIMUTH
e_by_az = []
# IDEAL surface_tilt ANGLE IN NORTHERN HEMISPHERE IS ~25
surface_tilt = 25
# ITERATING THROUGH DIFFERENT SURFACE_AZIMUTH VALUES
for heading in heading_DF["Heading"]:
surface_azimuth = heading
poa_sky_diffuse = pvlib.irradiance.get_sky_diffuse(
surface_tilt, surface_azimuth, solar_zenith, solar_azimuth,
dni, ghi, dhi, dni_extra=dni_extra, model='haydavies')
# calculate the angle of incidence using the surface_azimuth and (hardcoded) surface_tilt
aoi = pvlib.irradiance.aoi(
surface_tilt, surface_azimuth, solar_zenith, solar_azimuth)
# https://pvlib-python.readthedocs.io/en/stable/generated/pvlib.irradiance.aoi.html
# https://pvlib-python.readthedocs.io/en/stable/generated/pvlib.pvsystem.PVSystem.html
poa_ground_diffuse = pvlib.irradiance.get_ground_diffuse(
surface_tilt, ghi, albedo=surface_albedo)
poa = pvlib.irradiance.poa_components(
aoi, dni, poa_sky_diffuse, poa_ground_diffuse)
poa_direct = poa['poa_direct']
poa_diffuse = poa['poa_diffuse']
poa_global = poa['poa_global']
iam = pvlib.iam.ashrae(aoi)
effective_irradiance = poa_direct*iam + poa_diffuse
temp_cell = pvlib.temperature.pvsyst_cell(poa_global, temp_air)
# THIS IS THE MAGIC
cecparams = pvlib.pvsystem.calcparams_cec(
effective_irradiance, temp_cell,
CECMOD_MONO.alpha_sc, CECMOD_MONO.a_ref,
CECMOD_MONO.I_L_ref, CECMOD_MONO.I_o_ref,
CECMOD_MONO.R_sh_ref, CECMOD_MONO.R_s, CECMOD_MONO.Adjust)
# mpp is the list of energy output by hour for the whole year using a single panel
mpp = pvlib.pvsystem.max_power_point(*cecparams, method='newton')
mpp = pd.DataFrame(mpp, index=TIMES)
first48 = mpp[:48]
Edaily = mpp.p_mp.resample('D').sum()
# Edaily is the list of energy output by day for the whole year using a single panel
Eyearly = sum(Edaily)
e_by_az.append(Eyearly)
## LINKING THE Heading (ie. surface_azimuth) AND THE Eyearly (ie. yearly energy output) IN A DF
heading_DF["Eyearly"] = e_by_az
heading_DF.head()
## VISUALIZE ENERGY OUTPUT BY SURFACE_AZIMUTH
plt.plot(heading_DF["Heading"], heading_DF["Eyearly"])
plt.xlabel("Surface_Azimuth Angle")
plt.ylabel("Yearly Energy Output with tilt @ " + str(surface_tilt))
plt.title("Yearly Energy Output by Solar_Azimuth Angle using surface_tilt = " + str(surface_tilt) + " in Berkeley, CA");
# FIND SURFACE_AZIMUTH THAT YIELDS THE MAX ENERGY OUTPUT
heading_DF[heading_DF["Eyearly"] == max(heading_DF["Eyearly"])]
# FIND SURFACE_AZIMUTH THAT YIELDS THE MIN ENERGY OUTPUT
heading_DF[heading_DF["Eyearly"] == min(heading_DF["Eyearly"])]
发布于 2020-12-23 22:37:36
感谢kevinanderso@gmail.com在pvlib-python中帮助了我。他指出,我的“时间变量不是时区感知的,因此太阳位置的计算假设UTC”。
为了解决这个问题,他建议我用tz=‘Etc/GMT+8’(即)初始化时间。在美国)。
用他的话说,“我最初发布的代码是建立一个假设系统的模型,在这个系统中,太阳的位置和辐照度是相互间的时间偏移,这与现实大不相同,所以现实生活中的期望不适用于你的模型。”
感谢凯文,希望这能帮助其他有类似问题的人。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65417508
复制相似问题