Running with Spring Boot v2.5.7
如今,致力于帮助开发者用更少的代码、更快地写出生产级系统的 Spring Boot 已然成为 Java 应用开发的事实标准。在 Spring Boot 提供的众多特性中,自动配置无疑是对提升开发体验最显著的一个特性,Spring Boot 基于这一特性为开发人员自动声明了若干开箱即用、具备某一功能的 Bean。大多数情况下,自动配置的 Bean 刚好能满足大家的需求,但在某些情况下,不得不完整地覆盖它们,这个时候只需要重新声明相关类型的 Bean 即可,因为绝大多数自动配置的 Bean 都会由@ConditionalOnMissingBean
注解修饰。幸运的是,如果只是想微调一些细节,比如改改端口号 (server.port) 和数据源 URL (spring.datasource.url) ,那压根没必要重新声明ServerProperties
和DataSourceProperties
这俩 Bean 来覆盖自动配置的 Bean。Spring Boot 为自动配置的 Bean 提供了1000多个用于微调的属性,当需要调整设置时,只需要在环境变量、命令行参数或配置文件 (application.properties/application.yml) 中进行指定即可,这就是 Spring Boot 的Externalized Configuration
(配置外化) 特性。
当然,外部配置源并不局限于环境变量、命令行参数和配置文件这三种,感兴趣的读者可以自行阅读 Spring Boot 官方文档。在 Spring 中,BeanFactory
扮演着 Bean 容器的角色,而Environment
同样定位为一个容器,即外部配置源中的属性都会被添加到 Environment 中。在微服务大行其道的今天,外部配置源又衍生出了Disconf、Apollo 和 Nacos 等分布式配置中心,但在 Spring 的地盘,还是要入乡随俗,从配置中心中读取到的属性依然会被追加到 Environment 中。
笔者之所以写这篇文章,是受jasypt
组件的启发。第一次接触它是在2018年,当时就很好奇这玩意儿究竟是如何实现对敏感属性加解密的;现在来看,要想实现这么一个东东,不仅需要熟悉 Bean 的生命周期、IoC 容器拓展点 (IoC Container Extension Points) 和 Spring Boot 的启动流程等知识,还需要掌握 Environment。
jasypt 上手十分简单。首先通过jasypt-maven-plugin
这一 maven 插件为敏感属性值生成密文,然后将ENC(密文)
替换敏感属性值即可。如下:
jasypt.encryptor.password=crimson_typhoon
spring.datasource.url=jdbc:mysql://HOST:PORT/db_sql_boy?characterEncoding=UTF-8
spring.datasource.hikari.driver-class-name=com.mysql.cj.jdbc.Driver
spring.datasource.hikari.username=root
spring.datasource.hikari.password=ENC(qS8+DEIlHxvhPHgn1VaW3oHkn2twrmwNOHewWLIfquAXiCDBrKwvIhDoqalKyhIF)
在实际工作中,我们与 Environment 打交道的机会并不多;如果业务 Bean 确实需要获取外部配置源中的某一属性值,可以手动将 Environment 注入到该业务 Bean 中,也可以直接实现EnvironmentAware
接口,得到 Environment 类型的 Bean 实例之后可以通过getProperty()
获取具体属性值。Environment 接口内容如下所示:
public interface Environment extends PropertyResolver {
String[] getActiveProfiles();
String[] getDefaultProfiles();
boolean acceptsProfiles(Profiles profiles);
}
public interface PropertyResolver {
boolean containsProperty(String key);
String getProperty(String key);
String getProperty(String key, String defaultValue);
<T> T getProperty(String key, Class<T> targetType);
<T> T getProperty(String key, Class<T> targetType, T defaultValue);
String resolvePlaceholders(String text);
}
大家不要受 Environment 中 getProperty() 方法的误导,外部配置源中的属性并不是以单个属性为维度被添加到 Environment 中的,而是以PropertySource
为维度。PropertySource 是对属性源名称和该属性源中一组属性的抽象,MapPropertySource
是一种最简单的实现,它通过 Map<String, Object> 来承载相关的属性。PropertySource 内容如下:
public abstract class PropertySource<T> {
protected final String name;
protected final T source;
public PropertySource(String name, T source) {
this.name = name;
this.source = source;
}
public String getName() { return this.name; }
public T getSource() { return this.source; }
public abstract Object getProperty(String name);
}
从上述 PropertySource 内容来看,PropertySource 自身是具备根据属性名获取属性值这一能力的。
getProperty()内部执行逻辑
一般,Environment 实现类中会持有一个PropertyResolver
类型的成员变量,进而交由 PropertyResolver 负责执行 getProperty() 逻辑。PropertyResolver 实现类中又会持有两个成员变量,分别是:ConversionService
与PropertySources
;首先,PropertyResolver 遍历 PropertySources
中的 PropertySource,获取原生属性值;然后委派 ConversionService 对原生属性值进行数据类型转换 (如果有必要的话)。虽然 PropertySource 自身是具备根据属性名获取属性值这一能力的,但不具备占位符解析与类型转换能力,于是在中间引入具备这两种能力的 PropertyResolver, 这也印证了一个段子:在计算机科学中,没有什么问题是在中间加一层解决不了的,如果有,那就再加一层。
PropertySource内部更新逻辑
Environment 实现类中除了持有PropertyResolver
类型的成员变量外,还有一个MutablePropertySources
类型的成员变量,但并不提供直接操作该 MutablePropertySources 的方法,我们只能通过getPropertySources()
方法获取 MutablePropertySources 实例,然后借助 MutablePropertySources 中的addFirst()
、addLast()
和replace()
等方法去更新 PropertySource。MutablePropertySources 是 PropertySources 唯一一个实现类,如下图所示:
总的来说,Environment 是对 PropertySource 和 Profile 的顶级抽象,下面介绍 Profile 的概念。当应用程序需要部署到不同的运行环境时,一些属性项通常会有所不同,比如,数据源 URL 在开发环境和测试环境就会不一样。Spring 从3.1版本开始支持基于 Profile 的条件化配置。
Profile in Spring 3.1在 Spring 发布3.1版本时,Spring Boot 还未问世,可以说此时的 Profile 特性还是有些瑕疵的,但瑕不掩瑜。主要体现在:针对同一类型的 Bean,必须声明多次。一起来感受下这种小瑕疵:
@Configuration(proxyBeanMethods = false)
public class DataSourceConfig {
@Bean
@Profile("dev")
public DataSource devDataSource () {
return DataSourceBuilder.create()
.driverClassName("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver")
.url("jdbc:mysql://DEV_HOST:PORT/db_sql_boy?characterEncoding=UTF-8")
.username("dev")
.password("dev")
.build();
}
@Bean
@Profile("test")
public DataSource testDataSource () {
return DataSourceBuilder.create()
.driverClassName("com.mysql.jdbc.Driver")
.url("jdbc:mysql://TEST_HOST:PORT/db_sql_boy?characterEncoding=UTF-8")
.username("test")
.password("test")
.build();
}
}
Profile in Spring BootSpring Boot 发布后,@Profile
注解可以扔到九霄云外了。官方开发大佬肯定也意识到 Profile in Spring 3.1 中这种瑕疵,于是在 Spring Boot 第一版本 (1.0.0.RELEASE) 中就支持为 application.properties 和 application.yml 里的属性项配置 Profile 了。换个口味,一起来感受下这种优雅:
@Configuration(proxyBeanMethods = false)
public class DataSourceConfig {
@Bean
public DataSource devDataSource (DataSourceProperties dataSourceProperties) {
return DataSourceBuilder.create()
.driverClassName(dataSourceProperties.getDriverClassName())
.url(dataSourceProperties.getUrl())
.username(dataSourceProperties.getUsername())
.password(dataSourceProperties.getPassword())
.build();
}
}
application-dev.properties 内容如下:
spring.datasource.url=jdbc:mysql://DEV_HOST:PORT/db_sql_boy?characterEncoding=UTF-8
spring.datasource.hikari.driver-class-name=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
spring.datasource.hikari.password=dev
spring.datasource.hikari.username=dev
application-test.properties 内容如下:
spring.datasource.url=jdbc:mysql://TEST_HOST:PORT/db_sql_boy?characterEncoding=UTF-8
spring.datasource.hikari.driver-class-name=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
spring.datasource.hikari.password=test
spring.datasource.hikari.username=test
在原生 Spring 3.1 和 Spring Boot 中,均是通过spring.profiles.active
来为 Environment 指定激活的 Profile,否则Environment 中默认激活的 Profile 名称为default
。写到这里,笔者脑海中闪现一个问题:一般,@Profile
注解主要与 @Configuration 注解或 @Bean 注解搭配使用,如果 spring.profiles.active 的值为 dev 时,那么那些由 @Configuration 或 @Bean 注解标记 (但没有@Profile
注解的身影哈) 的 Bean 还会被解析为若干BeanDefinition
实例吗?答案是会的。ConfigurationClassPostProcessor
负责将 @Configuration 配置类解析为 BeanDefinition,在此过程中会执行ConditionEvaluator
的shouldSkip()
方法,主要内容如下:
public class ConditionEvaluator {
public boolean shouldSkip(AnnotatedTypeMetadata metadata, ConfigurationCondition.ConfigurationPhase phase) {
if (metadata == null || !metadata.isAnnotated(Conditional.class.getName())) {
return false;
}
if (phase == null) {
if (metadata instanceof AnnotationMetadata &&
ConfigurationClassUtils.isConfigurationCandidate((AnnotationMetadata) metadata)) {
return shouldSkip(metadata, ConfigurationCondition.ConfigurationPhase.PARSE_CONFIGURATION);
}
return shouldSkip(metadata, ConfigurationCondition.ConfigurationPhase.REGISTER_BEAN);
}
List<Condition> conditions = new ArrayList<>();
for (String[] conditionClasses : getConditionClasses(metadata)) {
for (String conditionClass : conditionClasses) {
Condition condition = getCondition(conditionClass, this.context.getClassLoader());
conditions.add(condition);
}
}
AnnotationAwareOrderComparator.sort(conditions);
for (Condition condition : conditions) {
ConfigurationCondition.ConfigurationPhase requiredPhase = null;
if (condition instanceof ConfigurationCondition) {
requiredPhase = ((ConfigurationCondition) condition).getConfigurationPhase();
}
if ((requiredPhase == null || requiredPhase == phase) && !condition.matches(this.context, metadata)) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
}
shouldSkip()
方法第一行 if 语句就是答案,@Profile
注解由@Conditional(ProfileCondition.class)
修饰,那如果一个配置类头上没有Condition
的身影,直接返回false
了,那就是不跳过该配置类的意思喽!
Environment 中的这些 PropertySource 究竟有啥用啊?当然是为了填充 Bean 喽,废话不多说,上图。
笔者以前都是用 visio 和 processOn 画图,第一次体验 draw.io,没想到如此优秀,强烈安利一波!
本节主要介绍 Spring Boot 在启动过程中向 Environmnt 中究竟注册了哪些 PropertySource。启动入口位于SpringApplication
中的run(String... args)
方法,如下:
public class SpringApplication {
public ConfigurableApplicationContext run(String... args) {
StopWatch stopWatch = new StopWatch();
stopWatch.start();
DefaultBootstrapContext bootstrapContext = createBootstrapContext();
ConfigurableApplicationContext context = null;
configureHeadlessProperty();
SpringApplicationRunListeners listeners = getRunListeners(args);
listeners.starting(bootstrapContext, this.mainApplicationClass);
try {
ApplicationArguments applicationArguments = new DefaultApplicationArguments(args);
ConfigurableEnvironment environment = prepareEnvironment(listeners, bootstrapContext, applicationArguments);
configureIgnoreBeanInfo(environment);
Banner printedBanner = printBanner(environment);
context = createApplicationContext();
context.setApplicationStartup(this.applicationStartup);
prepareContext(bootstrapContext, context, environment, listeners, applicationArguments, printedBanner);
refreshContext(context);
afterRefresh(context, applicationArguments);
stopWatch.stop();
if (this.logStartupInfo) {
new StartupInfoLogger(this.mainApplicationClass).logStarted(getApplicationLog(), stopWatch);
}
listeners.started(context);
callRunners(context, applicationArguments);
} catch (Throwable ex) {
handleRunFailure(context, ex, listeners);
throw new IllegalStateException(ex);
}
try {
listeners.running(context);
} catch (Throwable ex) {
handleRunFailure(context, ex, null);
throw new IllegalStateException(ex);
}
return context;
}
}
可以明显看出,Environmnt 的初始化是在refreshContext(context)
之前完成的,这是毫无疑问的。run() 方法很复杂,但与本文主题契合的逻辑只有一处:
prepareEnvironment(listeners, bootstrapContext, applicationArguments);
显然,核心内容都在prepareEnvironment()
方法内,下面分小节逐一分析。
public class SpringApplication {
private ConfigurableEnvironment prepareEnvironment(SpringApplicationRunListeners listeners,
DefaultBootstrapContext bootstrapContext,
ApplicationArguments applicationArguments) {
// 2.2.1
ConfigurableEnvironment environment = getOrCreateEnvironment();
// 2.2.2
configureEnvironment(environment, applicationArguments.getSourceArgs());
// 2.2.3
ConfigurationPropertySources.attach(environment);
// 2.2.4
listeners.environmentPrepared(bootstrapContext, environment);
DefaultPropertiesPropertySource.moveToEnd(environment);
bindToSpringApplication(environment);
ConfigurationPropertySources.attach(environment);
return environment;
}
}
getOrCreateEnvironment()
主要负责构建 Environment 实例。如果当前应用是基于同步阻塞I/O
模型的,则 Environment 选用ApplicationServletEnvironment
;相反地,如果当前应用是基于异步非阻塞I/O
模型的,则 Environment 选用ApplicationReactiveWebEnvironment
。我们工作中基本都是基于 Spring MVC 开发应用,Spring MVC 是一款构建于Servlet API
之上、基于同步阻塞 I/O 模型的主流 Java Web 开发框架,这种 I/O 模型意味着一个 HTTP 请求对应一个线程,即每一个 HTTP 请求都是在各自线程上下文中完成处理的。ApplicationServletEnvironment 继承关系如下图所示:
从上图可以看出 ApplicationServletEnvironment 家族相当庞大,在执行 ApplicationServletEnvironment 构造方法的时候必然会触发各级父类构造方法中的逻辑,依次为:
public abstract class AbstractEnvironment implements ConfigurableEnvironment {
public AbstractEnvironment() {
this(new MutablePropertySources());
}
protected AbstractEnvironment(MutablePropertySources propertySources) {
this.propertySources = propertySources;
// createPropertyResolver(propertySources)
// |___ ConfigurationPropertySources.createPropertyResolver(propertySources)
// |___ new ConfigurationPropertySourcesPropertyResolver(propertySources)
this.propertyResolver = createPropertyResolver(propertySources);
customizePropertySources(propertySources);
}
}
public class StandardServletEnvironment extends StandardEnvironment implements ConfigurableWebEnvironment {
@Override
protected void customizePropertySources(MutablePropertySources propertySources) {
propertySources.addLast(new StubPropertySource("servletConfigInitParams"));
propertySources.addLast(new StubPropertySource("servletContextInitParams"));
super.customizePropertySources(propertySources);
}
}
public class StandardEnvironment extends AbstractEnvironment {
@Override
protected void customizePropertySources(MutablePropertySources propertySources) {
propertySources.addLast(
new PropertiesPropertySource("systemProperties", (Map) System.getProperties()));
propertySources.addLast(
new SystemEnvironmentPropertySource("systemEnvironment", (Map) System.getenv()));
}
}
随着 ApplicationServletEnvironment 构造方法的执行,此时在 Environment 里 MutablePropertySources 类型的成员变量propertySources
中已经有了四个 PropertySource 了,名称依次是:servletConfigInitParams
、servletContextInitParams
、systemProperties
和systemEnvironment
。此外,也要记住 ApplicationServletEnvironment 中的两个重要成员变量,即MutablePropertySources
和ConfigurationPropertySourcesPropertyResolver
。
configureEnvironment()
方法中的逻辑也很简单哈。首先,为 Environment 中的 PropertySourcesPropertyResolver 设定 ConversionService;然后,向 Environment 中的 MutablePropertySources 追加一个名称为commandLineArgs
的 PropertySource 实例,注意使用的是addFirst()
方法哦,这意味着这个名称为commandLineArgs
的 PropertySource 优先级是最高的。主要逻辑如下:
public class SpringApplication {
protected void configureEnvironment(ConfigurableEnvironment environment, String[] args) {
if (this.addConversionService) {
environment.getPropertyResolver().setConversionService(new ApplicationConversionService());
}
if (this.addCommandLineProperties && args.length > 0) {
MutablePropertySources sources = environment.getPropertySources();
sources.addFirst(new SimpleCommandLinePropertySource(args));
}
}
}
继续SimpleCommandLinePropertySource
:
public class SimpleCommandLinePropertySource extends CommandLinePropertySource<CommandLineArgs> {
public SimpleCommandLinePropertySource(String... args) {
// 其父类构造方法为:super("commandLineArgs", source)
super(new SimpleCommandLineArgsParser().parse(args));
}
}
命令行参数还是比较常用的,比如我们在启动 Spring Boot 应用时会这样声明命令行参数:java -jar app.jar --server.port=8088
。
attach()
方法主要就是在 Environment 中 MutablePropertySources 的头部位置插入加一个名称为configurationProperties
的 PropertySource 实例。主要逻辑如下:
public final class ConfigurationPropertySources {
public static void attach(org.springframework.core.env.Environment environment) {
MutablePropertySources sources = ((ConfigurableEnvironment) environment).getPropertySources();
PropertySource<?> attached = getAttached(sources);
if (attached != null && attached.getSource() != sources) {
sources.remove(ATTACHED_PROPERTY_SOURCE_NAME);
attached = null;
}
if (attached == null) {
sources.addFirst(new ConfigurationPropertySourcesPropertySource("configurationProperties", new SpringConfigurationPropertySources(sources)));
}
}
static PropertySource<?> getAttached(MutablePropertySources sources) {
return (sources != null) ? sources.get("configurationProperties") : null;
}
}
笔者盯着这玩意儿看了好久,压根没看出这个名称为configurationProperties
的 PropertySource 究竟有啥用。最后,还是在官方文档中关于Relaxed Binding
(宽松绑定) 的描述中猜出了些端倪。还是通过代码来解读比较直接。首先,在 application.properties 中追加一个配置项:a.b.my-first-key=hello spring environment
;然后,通过 Environment 取出这个配置项的值,如下:
@SpringBootApplication
public class DemoApplication {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ConfigurableApplicationContext configurableApplicationContext = SpringApplication.run(DemoApplication.class, args);
ConfigurableWebEnvironment environment = (ConfigurableWebEnvironment)
configurableApplicationContext.getBean(Environment.class);
System.out.println(environment.getProperty("a.b.my-first-key"));
}
}
启动应用后,控制台打印出了 hello spring environment 字样,这与预期是相符的。可当我们通过environment.getProperty("a.b.myfirstkey")
或者environment.getProperty("a.b.my-firstkey")
依然能够获取到配置项的内容。a.b.myfirstkey
和a.b.my-firstkey
并不是配置文件中的属性名称,只是相似而已,这的确很宽松啊,哈哈。感兴趣的读者可以自行 DEBUG 看看其中的原理。
敲黑板,各位大佬,这个要考的 !environmentPrepared()
方法会广播一个ApplicationEnvironmentPreparedEvent
事件,接着由EnvironmentPostProcessorApplicationListener
响应该事件,这应该是典型的观察者模式。主要内容如下:
public class SpringApplicationRunListeners {
private final List<SpringApplicationRunListener> listeners;
void environmentPrepared(ConfigurableBootstrapContext bootstrapContext, ConfigurableEnvironment environment) {
doWithListeners("spring.boot.application.environment-prepared",
(listener) -> listener.environmentPrepared(bootstrapContext, environment));
}
private void doWithListeners(String stepName, Consumer<SpringApplicationRunListener> listenerAction) {
StartupStep step = this.applicationStartup.start(stepName);
this.listeners.forEach(listenerAction);
step.end();
}
}
public class EventPublishingRunListener implements SpringApplicationRunListener, Ordered {
@Override
public void environmentPrepared(ConfigurableBootstrapContext bootstrapContext,
ConfigurableEnvironment environment) {
this.initialMulticaster.multicastEvent(
new ApplicationEnvironmentPreparedEvent(bootstrapContext, this.application, this.args, environment));
}
}
public class SimpleApplicationEventMulticaster extends AbstractApplicationEventMulticaster {
@Override
public void multicastEvent(ApplicationEvent event) {
multicastEvent(event, resolveDefaultEventType(event));
}
@Override
public void multicastEvent(final ApplicationEvent event, @Nullable ResolvableType eventType) {
ResolvableType type = (eventType != null ? eventType : resolveDefaultEventType(event));
Executor executor = getTaskExecutor();
for (ApplicationListener<?> listener : getApplicationListeners(event, type)) {
if (executor != null) {
executor.execute(() -> invokeListener(listener, event));
} else {
invokeListener(listener, event);
}
}
}
}
下面来看一下EnvironmentPostProcessorApplicationListener
的庐山真面目:
public class EnvironmentPostProcessorApplicationListener implements SmartApplicationListener, Ordered {
@Override
public void onApplicationEvent(ApplicationEvent event) {
if (event instanceof ApplicationEnvironmentPreparedEvent) {
onApplicationEnvironmentPreparedEvent((ApplicationEnvironmentPreparedEvent) event);
}
if (event instanceof ApplicationPreparedEvent) {
onApplicationPreparedEvent();
}
if (event instanceof ApplicationFailedEvent) {
onApplicationFailedEvent();
}
}
private void onApplicationEnvironmentPreparedEvent(ApplicationEnvironmentPreparedEvent event) {
ConfigurableEnvironment environment = event.getEnvironment();
SpringApplication application = event.getSpringApplication();
for (EnvironmentPostProcessor postProcessor : getEnvironmentPostProcessors(application.getResourceLoader(), event.getBootstrapContext())) {
postProcessor.postProcessEnvironment(environment, application);
}
}
}
EnvironmentPostProcessor
是 Spring Boot 为 Environment 量身打造的扩展点。这里引用官方文档中比较精炼的一句话:Allows for customization of the application's Environment prior to the application context being refreshed。EnvironmentPostProcessor 是一个函数性接口,内容如下:
public interface EnvironmentPostProcessor {
void postProcessEnvironment(ConfigurableEnvironment environment, SpringApplication application);
}
在上述 EnvironmentPostProcessorApplicationListener 事件处理逻辑中,getEnvironmentPostProcessors
负责加载出所有的 EnvironmentPostProcessor 。看一下内部加载逻辑:
public interface EnvironmentPostProcessorsFactory {
static EnvironmentPostProcessorsFactory fromSpringFactories(ClassLoader classLoader) {
return new ReflectionEnvironmentPostProcessorsFactory(
classLoader,
SpringFactoriesLoader.loadFactoryNames(EnvironmentPostProcessor.class, classLoader)
);
}
}
继续进入SpringFactoriesLoader
一探究竟:
public final class SpringFactoriesLoader {
public static final String FACTORIES_RESOURCE_LOCATION = "META-INF/spring.factories";
public static List<String> loadFactoryNames(Class<?> factoryType, ClassLoader classLoader) {
ClassLoader classLoaderToUse = classLoader;
if (classLoaderToUse == null) {
classLoaderToUse = SpringFactoriesLoader.class.getClassLoader();
}
String factoryTypeName = factoryType.getName();
return loadSpringFactories(classLoaderToUse).getOrDefault(factoryTypeName, Collections.emptyList());
}
private static Map<String, List<String>> loadSpringFactories(ClassLoader classLoader) {
Map<String, List<String>> result = cache.get(classLoader);
if (result != null) {
return result;
}
result = new HashMap<>();
try {
Enumeration<URL> urls = classLoader.getResources(FACTORIES_RESOURCE_LOCATION);
while (urls.hasMoreElements()) {
URL url = urls.nextElement();
UrlResource resource = new UrlResource(url);
Properties properties = PropertiesLoaderUtils.loadProperties(resource);
for (Map.Entry<?, ?> entry : properties.entrySet()) {
String factoryTypeName = ((String) entry.getKey()).trim();
String[] factoryImplementationNames = StringUtils.commaDelimitedListToStringArray((String) entry.getValue());
for (String factoryImplementationName : factoryImplementationNames) {
result.computeIfAbsent(factoryTypeName, key -> new ArrayList<>())
.add(factoryImplementationName.trim());
}
}
}
result.replaceAll((factoryType, implementations) -> implementations.stream().distinct()
.collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collectors.toList(), Collections::unmodifiableList)));
cache.put(classLoader, result);
} catch (IOException ex) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Unable to load factories from location [" + FACTORIES_RESOURCE_LOCATION + "]", ex);
}
return result;
}
}
Spring SPI SpringFactoriesLoader 这一套逻辑就是 Spring 中的
SPI
机制;直白点说,就是从classpath
下的META-INF/spring.factories
文件中加载 EnvironmentPostProcessor ,如果大家有需求就将自己实现的 EnvironmentPostProcessor 放到该文件中就行了。其实与JDK
中的SPI
机制很类似哈。
在当前版本,Spring Boot 内置了7个 EnvironmentPostProcessor 实现类。接下来挑几个比较典型的分析下。
RandomValuePropertySourceEnvironmentPostProcessor
RandomValuePropertySourceEnvironmentPostProcessor
向 Environment 中追加了一个名称为random
的 PropertySource,即RandomValuePropertySource
。内容如下:
public class RandomValuePropertySourceEnvironmentPostProcessor implements EnvironmentPostProcessor, Ordered {
public static final int ORDER = Ordered.HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE + 1;
private final Log logger;
public RandomValuePropertySourceEnvironmentPostProcessor(Log logger) {
this.logger = logger;
}
@Override
public int getOrder() {
return ORDER;
}
@Override
public void postProcessEnvironment(ConfigurableEnvironment environment, SpringApplication application) {
RandomValuePropertySource.addToEnvironment(environment, this.logger);
}
}
那么这个 RandomValuePropertySource 有啥作用呢?主要就是用于生成随机数,比如:environment.getProperty("random.int(5,10)")
可以获取一个随机数。以random.int
为属性名可以获取一个 int 类型的随机数;以random.long
为属性名可以获取一个 long 类型的随机数;以random.int(5,10)
为属性名可以获取一个 [5, 10} 区间内 int 类型的随机数,更多玩法大家自行探索。
SystemEnvironmentPropertySourceEnvironmentPostProcessor
当前,Environment 中已经存在一个名称为systemEnvironment
的 PropertySource,即SystemEnvironmentPropertySource
。SystemEnvironmentPropertySourceEnvironmentPostProcessor
用于将该 SystemEnvironmentPropertySource 替换为OriginAwareSystemEnvironmentPropertySource
,咋有点“脱裤子放屁,多此一举”的感觉呢,哈哈。
public class SystemEnvironmentPropertySourceEnvironmentPostProcessor implements EnvironmentPostProcessor, Ordered {
public static final int DEFAULT_ORDER = SpringApplicationJsonEnvironmentPostProcessor.DEFAULT_ORDER - 1;
private int order = DEFAULT_ORDER;
@Override
public int getOrder() {
return this.order;
}
@Override
public void postProcessEnvironment(ConfigurableEnvironment environment, SpringApplication application) {
String sourceName = "systemEnvironment";
PropertySource<?> propertySource = environment.getPropertySources().get(sourceName);
if (propertySource != null) {
replacePropertySource(environment, sourceName, propertySource, application.getEnvironmentPrefix());
}
}
private void replacePropertySource(ConfigurableEnvironment environment, String sourceName,
PropertySource<?> propertySource, String environmentPrefix) {
Map<String, Object> originalSource = (Map<String, Object>) propertySource.getSource();
SystemEnvironmentPropertySource source = new OriginAwareSystemEnvironmentPropertySource(sourceName, originalSource, environmentPrefix);
environment.getPropertySources().replace(sourceName, source);
}
}
SpringApplicationJsonEnvironmentPostProcessor
我们在通过java -jar -Dspring.application.json={"name":"duxiaotou"} app.jar
启动 Spring Boot 应用的时候,该属性会被自动添加到 JVM 系统属性中 (其实 -Dkey=value 这种形式的属性均是如此),其等效于System.setProperty(key, value)
;而当存在SPRING_APPLICATION_JSON
这一系统变量时,自然也会在System.getenv()
中出现。前面曾经提到过System.getProperties()
代表的是systemProperties
这一 PropertySource,而System.getenv()
则代表的是systemEnvironment
这一 PropertySource。SpringApplicationJsonEnvironmentPostProcessor
就是用于从这两个 PropertySource 中抽取出 spring.application.json 或 SPRING_APPLICATION_JSON 的 JSON 串,进而单独向 Environment 中追加一个名称为spring.application.json
的 PropertySource,即JsonPropertySource
。
ConfigDataEnvironmentPostProcessor
ConfigDataEnvironmentPostProcessor
负责将optional:classpath:/
、optional:classpath:/config/
、optional:file:./
、optional:file:./config/
和optional:file:./config/*/
这些目录下的 application.properties 配置文件加载出来;如果还指定了 spring.profiles.active的话,同时也会将这些目录下的 application-{profile}.properties 配置文件加载出来。最终,ConfigDataEnvironmentPostProcessor 将会向 Environment 中追加两个OriginTrackedMapPropertySource
,这俩 PropertySource 位于 Environment 的尾部;其中 application-{profile}.properties 所代表的 OriginTrackedMapPropertySource 是排在 application.properties 所代表的 OriginTrackedMapPropertySource 前面的,这一点挺重要。
jasypt
基础组件库与jasypt-spring-boot-starter
是不同作者写的,后者只是为 jasypt 组件开发了 Spring Boot 的起步依赖组件而已。本文所分析的其实就是这个起步依赖组件。
application.properties 配置文件中关于数据源的密码是一个加密后的密文,如下:
spring.datasource.hikari.password=ENC(4+t9a5QG8NkNdWVS6UjIX3dj18UtYRMqU6eb3wUKjivOiDHFLZC/RTK7HuWWkUtV)
当HikariDataSource
完成属性填充操作后,该 Bean 中 password 字段的值咋就变为解密后的 qwe@1234 这一明文了呢?显然,Spring Boot 为 Environment 提供的EnvironmentPostProcessor
这一拓展点可以实现偷天换日!但作者没有用它,而是使用了 Spring 中的一个 IoC 拓展点,即BeanFactoryPostProcessor
,这也是完全可以的,因为当执行到 BeanFactoryPostProcessor 中的postProcessBeanFactory()
逻辑时,只是完成了所有BeanDefinition
的加载,但还没有实例化 BeanDefinition 各自所对应的 Bean。
下面看一下EnableEncryptablePropertiesBeanFactoryPostProcessor
中的内容:
public class EnableEncryptablePropertiesBeanFactoryPostProcessor implements BeanFactoryPostProcessor, Ordered {
private final ConfigurableEnvironment environment;
private final EncryptablePropertySourceConverter converter;
public EnableEncryptablePropertiesBeanFactoryPostProcessor(ConfigurableEnvironment environment, EncryptablePropertySourceConverter converter) {
this.environment = environment;
this.converter = converter;
}
@Override
public void postProcessBeanFactory(ConfigurableListableBeanFactory beanFactory) throws BeansException {
MutablePropertySources propSources = environment.getPropertySources();
converter.convertPropertySources(propSources);
}
@Override
public int getOrder() {
return Ordered.LOWEST_PRECEDENCE - 100;
}
}
上述源码表明该 BeanFactoryPostProcessor 借助EncryptablePropertySourceConverter
对 MutablePropertySources 做了一层转换,那么转换成啥了呢?
接着,跟进 EncryptablePropertySourceConverter,核心内容如下:
public class EncryptablePropertySourceConverter {
public void convertPropertySources(MutablePropertySources propSources) {
propSources.stream()
.filter(ps -> !(ps instanceof EncryptablePropertySource))
.map(this::makeEncryptable)
.collect(toList())
.forEach(ps -> propSources.replace(ps.getName(), ps));
}
public <T> PropertySource<T> makeEncryptable(PropertySource<T> propertySource) {
if (propertySource instanceof EncryptablePropertySource
|| skipPropertySourceClasses.stream().anyMatch(skipClass -> skipClass.equals(propertySource.getClass()))) {
return propertySource;
}
PropertySource<T> encryptablePropertySource = convertPropertySource(propertySource);
return encryptablePropertySource;
}
private <T> PropertySource<T> convertPropertySource(PropertySource<T> propertySource) {
PropertySource<T> encryptablePropertySource;
if (propertySource instanceof SystemEnvironmentPropertySource) {
encryptablePropertySource = (PropertySource<T>) new EncryptableSystemEnvironmentPropertySourceWrapper((SystemEnvironmentPropertySource) propertySource, propertyResolver, propertyFilter);
} else if (propertySource instanceof MapPropertySource) {
encryptablePropertySource = (PropertySource<T>) new EncryptableMapPropertySourceWrapper((MapPropertySource) propertySource, propertyResolver, propertyFilter);
} else if (propertySource instanceof EnumerablePropertySource) {
encryptablePropertySource = new EncryptableEnumerablePropertySourceWrapper<>((EnumerablePropertySource) propertySource, propertyResolver, propertyFilter);
} else {
encryptablePropertySource = new EncryptablePropertySourceWrapper<>(propertySource, propertyResolver, propertyFilter);
}
return encryptablePropertySource;
}
}
显然,它将相关原生 PropertySource 转换为了一个EncryptablePropertySourceWrapper
,那这个肯定可以实现密文解密,必须的!
继续,跟进EncryptablePropertySourceWrapper
,内容如下:
public class EncryptablePropertySourceWrapper<T> extends PropertySource<T> implements EncryptablePropertySource<T> {
private final CachingDelegateEncryptablePropertySource<T> encryptableDelegate;
public EncryptablePropertySourceWrapper(PropertySource<T> delegate, EncryptablePropertyResolver resolver, EncryptablePropertyFilter filter) {
super(delegate.getName(), delegate.getSource());
encryptableDelegate = new CachingDelegateEncryptablePropertySource<>(delegate, resolver, filter);
}
@Override
public Object getProperty(String name) {
return encryptableDelegate.getProperty(name);
}
@Override
public PropertySource<T> getDelegate() {
return encryptableDelegate;
}
}
失望!没看出啥解密逻辑,但从其 getProperty 方法来看,将具体解析逻辑委派给了CachingDelegateEncryptablePropertySource
。
没办法,只能到 CachingDelegateEncryptablePropertySource 中一探究竟了:
public class CachingDelegateEncryptablePropertySource<T> extends PropertySource<T> implements EncryptablePropertySource<T> {
private final PropertySource<T> delegate;
private final EncryptablePropertyResolver resolver;
private final EncryptablePropertyFilter filter;
private final Map<String, Object> cache;
public CachingDelegateEncryptablePropertySource(PropertySource<T> delegate, EncryptablePropertyResolver resolver, EncryptablePropertyFilter filter) {
super(delegate.getName(), delegate.getSource());
this.delegate = delegate;
this.resolver = resolver;
this.filter = filter;
this.cache = new HashMap<>();
}
@Override
public PropertySource<T> getDelegate() {
return delegate;
}
@Override
public Object getProperty(String name) {
if (cache.containsKey(name)) {
return cache.get(name);
}
synchronized (name.intern()) {
if (!cache.containsKey(name)) {
Object resolved = getProperty(resolver, filter, delegate, name);
if (resolved != null) {
cache.put(name, resolved);
}
}
return cache.get(name);
}
}
}
终于,跟进到EncryptablePropertySource
中看到了解密的最终逻辑。其中,EncryptablePropertyDetector
负责探测相关属性是否需要对其解密,主要通过判断该属性值是否由ENC()
包裹。
public interface EncryptablePropertySource<T> extends OriginLookup<String> {
default Object getProperty(EncryptablePropertyResolver resolver, EncryptablePropertyFilter filter, PropertySource<T> source, String name) {
Object value = source.getProperty(name);
if (value != null && filter.shouldInclude(source, name) && value instanceof String) {
String stringValue = String.valueOf(value);
return resolver.resolvePropertyValue(stringValue);
}
return value;
}
}
public class DefaultPropertyResolver implements EncryptablePropertyResolver {
private final Environment environment;
private StringEncryptor encryptor;
private EncryptablePropertyDetector detector;
@Override
public String resolvePropertyValue(String value) {
return Optional.ofNullable(value)
.map(environment::resolvePlaceholders)
.filter(detector::isEncrypted)
.map(resolvedValue -> {
try {
String unwrappedProperty = detector.unwrapEncryptedValue(resolvedValue.trim());
String resolvedProperty = environment.resolvePlaceholders(unwrappedProperty);
return encryptor.decrypt(resolvedProperty);
} catch (EncryptionOperationNotPossibleException e) {
throw new DecryptionException("Unable to decrypt property: " + value + " resolved to: " + resolvedValue + ". Decryption of Properties failed, make sure encryption/decryption " +
"passwords match", e);
}
})
.orElse(value);
}
}
总结性的文字就不再说了,笔者现在文思泉涌,否则又能水300字。最后,希望大家记住在当前 Spring Boot 版本中,由ApplicationServletEnvironment
扮演 Environment,其最终将委派ConfigurationPropertySourcesPropertyResolver
去获取属性值。